terror-sor-rest-i-i-knigi-1

·

·

Terror: review of the series and books

Acquaintance with terror has become for me one of the most unusual in terms of assimilation. The fact is that before watching the series with the book, I was not familiar, however, watching the first two episodes, I decided that it was a week to wait a week to the third and sat down behind the source.

The volume of the book, of course, inspired fear. It was not very clear what the hell to stretch the plot, in the core of which the usual slasher was hidden with a terrible monster and people running from it, for such a monstrous number of pages, but the tie was very captured, so I firmly decided to at least try to master all this. As a result, it turned out that I barely had time to read to the moment on which the last series ended, as a new. Only by the last third the book captured me so much that I almost did not drop it from it until I read it to the finale.

Looking back, we can say that the series and book at first glance do not have so many differences and, thanks to such a parallel acquaintance, they also complemented each other, mutually leveling some disadvantages. I think I can only read it with one thing-I would have received a less vivid impression as a result.

Having finished both the hypostasis of the tragedy of the Franklin expedition, I was surprised to find that many people who looked just fell upon the nightmare of criticism of the series, of course, letting the eternal “Better”, “The original raped”, “Sorry, Dan, we are all stubborn”. Somehow it was … rapidly, because in some ways the adaptation even surpassed the book. Let’s figure out what exactly.

For completely uninitiated, terror is the novel by Dan Simmons, that very author of Hyperion. Terror is considered by many number 2 among its novels in terms of vinrarity, while the scope of events is almost perfect for film adaptation in the form of a series, and does not even require the budget of the game of thrones. The plot is based on real events and talks about the British expedition of the mid -19th century, the purpose of which was to open a short path to China through the archipelags located between Canada and Arctic. This expedition never returned, lost in the ice, which we immediately, in the first seconds, says both the series and the book.

This simple truth-“everyone will die at the end”, bite into the head from the very beginning, but does not cause any indignation, as if they had immediately spoiled the final. This knowledge, at first not very straining, rather only producing only to play in the usual count “And who will be devoured with the next one?”, By the middle begins to cause increasing sadness, and closer to the end the real feeling of hopelessness. Just here, he justifies himself that the ten -hour timing of the series, that the weighty volume of the book.

The narrative covers the period of four years, and all this time, almost to the very end, people do not lose hope, do not fall into despair, but try to courageously cope with all the hardships (among which, in addition to fierce colds, spoiled provisions and diseases, a certain unknown miracle-yudo also appears, which periodically flies into the ice-stuck in ice and produces the ships that have been stuck in the ice.sailors) and get out. At some point, you understand that they really deserve this, that you want all these inhuman efforts to somehow pay off … But they do not pay off, bringing you to moral exhaustion. And given that after 80% of the plot, more than two-thirds of the crew of ships are still alive, at some point you just cease to understand what these undying people eventually achieve. By the way, in this the series and the book are strikingly different from each other, but we will talk about the final in the spoiler part of the review.

I see no sense to describe the plot in more detail for those who are not familiar with the series / book, since in its fundamentally it is extremely simple. Next, I would just like to tell more in more detail what the series loses to the book, but in what (suddenly!) she wins. Perhaps this will help you figure out what you would be more willing for. Of course, I would advise you to get acquainted with both of them, however, if you decide to do it, it is better to watch the series first, because it will greatly help to form the images of heroes when reading. Let’s start with this.

In the novel itself, https://gamblingdata.net/casinos/golden-tiger-casino/ the action is described from the point of view of about a dozen crew members, however, even with a fugitive viewing of the table of contents, the captain of “Terror” Francis Croose immediately stands out among them (in this regard, the series is somewhat cunning, initially putting the head of the expedition of Sir John Franklin, and this technique in the future works perfectly), from which the novel is opened and from whom the pointThe vast majority of chapters are described, which makes him the main character from the very start. At least only the ship paramedic and Anat Gudsir can somehow compete with him, however, comparing them with the crown of the chapter, it immediately becomes clear which Simmons was more interesting to write about.

The book at least once voiced the names of almost all crew members (about one hundred and thirty people), many appear more than once, participate in conversations and somehow show themselves, someone is more, someone less. The problem is that almost everyone behaves the same. That the head of the expedition is Captain Franklin, that Captain Crozier, that their lieutenants, ship foremen, doctors and sailors – all, like true British of the Victorian era, lead measured and high -pairing conversations, in critical situations they do not complain, do not panic, even brought to the handle, but during the attacks of the rowing huge monster, they do not smash.which literally for showing brutally tears to pieces of their comrades, calmly coordinate actions and try to shoot him. At first, this causes real admiration-finally you can be attributed to this genre with a stretch) not stupid teenagers screening from each rustle, but a horde of united and maximum harsh men who are nothing nothing, but … all one hundred and thirty such are there all such such? Is it true? And after three years of deprivation, hungry, sick with scurvy and corrupted by a monster, which bullets do not take, everyone continues to behave almost as impenetrable as at the very beginning. At such moments, it seems that the novel was written not by the American Dan Simmons, but by the infernal patriot of Great Britain Charles Dickens, who is extoling the moral foundations of his sailors to some space heights. Of course, there are internal monologues of heroes in abundance, who make them more voluminous and interesting (some literally for one chapter reveal so cool that they immediately overshadow those who had previously been dedicated to this), there are shocking moments, for example, when the main villain of the novel (oddly enough, this is not about the monster now) begins to create some extremely cruel game, but the point is that everything remains in appearance.the same, and even the most repulsed and rumored from the heroes continue to maintain external calm and equanimity, what can we say about worthy men, who, even in the face of inevitable death, could not lose their humanity.

In the series, things are diametrically opposite. At first, the lack of those very internal monologues was very strongly felt, since at the beginning of the novel some heroes are given by a very extensive background, which in the series only hinted at rare flashbacks, and some small, in comparison with the book, the number of dialogs (this, however, soon ceases to be a problem, and the heroes from the third mouth open more willingly). But the behavior of people here is shown where it is more believable (except for Dr. Stanley-this is some hell who watched-he will understand), when people get sick-many constantly complain of pain and do not hide their torment when someone dies-their friends are burning when the monster attacks-only the most daring, the rest are quite right away and try to take away their legs quite fairly, and when it becomes clear that it becomes clear that it becomes clear that it becomes clear that it becomes clear that it becomes clear thatthere is nowhere to wait for salvation, then everyone immediately has their own head on the shoulders.

A great contribution to the humanization of heroes brings an excellent acting ensemble. In addition, many actors, albeit for the most part by the will of the scriptwriters, somewhat changed the approach to the heroes, moving away from the original source, and most of it benefit.

So, Sir John Franklin, who is played by Honored Caesar and Mans, the raider Kiaran Hynds, looks not a miserable old loser, who is not clear why his contemporaries Irl, and albeit a professional captain, is a very charismatic speaker capable of inspiring simple sailors.

The role of the protagonist – Captain Crose, played by Professor Moriarty of Richevsky Sherlock, compared to the novel, was somewhat reduced to reveal other heroes, which I, by the way, was incredibly happy, because here and there he seemed to me a rather strange candidate for the role of the central character – the least pleasant of the three captains, a vicious and depressive ownerAs a result, the largest amount of effort to save the crews of ships.

Dr. Harry Gudsir literally left the pages of the novel, and tearing it off from the diary (through which the lion’s share of the history of this hero was fed in the novel), it turned out to be better to reveal the rest of the expedition and his difficult relationships with them.

The roles of some of the focal of the novel – especially Lieutenant Irving, foreman Peella and his mentor Bridgens, were, unfortunately, reduced. On the other hand, the Ice pilot Blackie and Steward Captain Croose Jopson flickered here more often than in the original, and their episodes are one of the best in the series.

The conditional chief villain – Hikki Cornelius, turned out to be a completely different character than in the book, but at the same time no less (or even more) interesting. What was the charm of book Hikki: we practically do not see it the whole book, only when the crew begins to grumble somewhere behind the scenes, they inform the captains that, they say, the instigator Hikki is again. And when in the last third he begins to flicker often, breaking into one of the most vile scenes of the whole novel with pomp – this is impressive. You immediately understand how much everyone was underestimated, considering only an annoying fly. And when closer to the end of Simmons rewards the reader with a couple of chapters from the face of Hikki himself, showing which trash and carbon monoxide happening in his head, it remains only to sit and fuck. In the series, we see him from the very beginning, he is from the first series among leading characters. At first, the serial hikki even seems to be one of the most attractive heroes – unlike the book, here he is not the possessor of an unpleasant roof of appearance, but a very pretty guy standing out against the backdrop of overgrown sailors and officers, many of whom are horrible to each other, sharp to the tongue, extremely initiative, trying to be everywhere and aware of everything. However, his turning point is the same as in the book, although his further actions do not reach such an intensity, because initially in the series he is more adequate and prudent. On the other side it is disclosed (if you can say this at all) and its homosexuality. If in the book through the sexual connection of Hikki literally subjugates Magnus Manson – the healthier and stronger person on the ship, using him in the future as a lever of pressure on the rest, then in the series his romance with one of the sailors (the most ordinary dude) looks more like a marker of his impudence (after all, they can hang it for it, but Hicky does not give a damn about it).

Finally, I would like to talk about the third captain of the expedition with the funny name James Fitzjims. I take off my hat in front of Tobias Menzis (by Irony, who played in Rome, the murderer Hero Hinds -Bruta, which by the way in the series is already enjoyed twice), since he was from the character, who was only engaged in the book that was infinitely long and tiring reports on the state of his ship, turned into the most bright and most causing the greatest empathy of the hero in everything in everythingTV series. He appears in the frame almost as much as Crozier with Goodsir, becoming one of the full central heroes, and passes the most noticeable evolution during the plot.

So, summing up, the heroes themselves in the series turned out to be more lively and more interesting.

Also, in pluses, compared to the book, I can write down the best dynamics of what is happening. There are no thyroid series in the series, something is constantly happening, and they don’t let them get bored in 10 hours, constantly keeping in suspense. In the book, with this trouble. When you see a volume of 900 pages, you immediately understand that even a titled author simply wanted to water water. The first third of the book, each hero constantly begins to describe for a long time what snow around is white, the ship is creaky, the polar night is dark, and the sitting in place is dull. At first, this helps to plunge into what is happening, but then the same descriptions begin to set. More than once, internal monologues or even dialogs slide into tedding in the form of multi -page drilling by marine terms, in which an unprepared person does not understand a damn thing, in this regard the series to his viewer is much merciful.

Now I’ll tell you about what the book of the series fully and uncompromisingly devotes – these are the events and the atmosphere itself, which envelops them. In the series, you will not feel the fettered polar cold, when it is impossible to touch the objects without tearing your skin, and the nose sticking out from under the scarf threatens to immediately stain and fall off. On the screen, the heroes are almost never cold, whether a joke – in a pair of scenes one of the heroes walks without outerwear at all and feels great. Such an ignore, in fact, the main opponent of the expedition in the book depresses, because when reading the wind literally howled in the ears, and the tips of the fingers were numb. I will not say that the atmosphere in the series was completely lost because of this, but the book in this regard is two steps ahead. As for the events themselves, in the book they are also beaten in most cases somehow cooler, the most striking example that book fans like to give is the carnival arranged by the teams. There, for example, the monster’s pursuit of Blackie’s pilot, which begins and ends on the ship, and in the book moves to the labyrinth of icebergs, where one of the most terrible and tense scenes, or the study of the opened pegs, during which I literally read the scramble in the series, moves in the series, can be attributed to the series.There was no. On the other hand, some moments in the series are beaten much more logical, for example, having spent the first year in the ice, Crozier sends a small detachment to the south so that they do help if the ice will not thaw again next summer, which in the book, as far as I remember, was not taken, although such a step seemed obvious. Or the strange behavior of all the same Crowe in relation to the rebels and their leader, when he quickly guesses who they are and what they do, but for some reason does nothing against them, without explaining it, in the series beats up to the contrary-he immediately restores order, acting openly before the whole team. True, such moments are still not enough to balance the scales, especially when it comes to the final, most heavy part of the plot, the novel copes with his peak point perfectly, while the last three series of the series look somehow strange and crumpled (the feeling of time is especially suffering that the book has not read at a length of almost half a year, because everything looks like for the screen, as if for the screen as if for it as ifThe last three episodes pass only a couple of days).

Well, now the part for those who watched to the final. I would like to discuss it, because in the series, that in the novel I did not receive any satisfaction from him.

Dan Simmons has something strange on the last hundred pages. As soon as the last heroes-focal heroes die-Goodsir and Hikki, and only Crozier remains, the plot turns off somewhere in the wrong place. At this point, about forty people still remain alive, they, led by Devo, finally get to open water and begin to swim through the bay in Canada, and … their fate remains unknown. They simply disappear from the pages of the novel, the whole mother of his forty living characters, who most likely just invigorate behind the scenes. Instead, the reader is cut off for no reason for a reason, the huge layer of the Ino’s myths, the only purpose of which is to explain that the monster is actually some kind of immortal magical creature, and miserable people did not have a single chance to win him, and Crozier refuses to return home, suddenly marries a local resident, cuts off his tongue and worship the creatures who killed two.A dozen people from his team. Well, fuck now. True, the last scene where he burns terror is more or less good.

In the series, the finale, as I said above, came out extremely crumpled. The inconsistencies in it, however, are smaller – here everything except Crozier, and really die before our eyes (and it becomes so insulting that the lost people did not seem to me by such a series of such a bad idea), but instead of a huge series of failures and disasters, the monster’s problem is immediately solved by the monster in the end. If in the book Tuunbak was only one of the threats and laid in total for the entire book (three years of active activity) a person of twenty, then in the series from his teeth and claws he dies at all the entire expedition, and if at the beginning he drags everyone one at a time, then in the last episodes he simply flies into the camps openly, cutting out ten people there dozens. On the other hand, I liked that in the series Toonbak is not some kind of deity, but simply a huge and tenacious beast (although their ability to allegedly eat souls left), which the heroes with varying success manage to fight back and even seriously injure, and at the very end to kill. It is much better than his strange superpowancy beats – if in the book, having met Hikki, he simply sniffed him and coughed, deciding not to absorb his rotten soul, then in the series he tries to devour Hikki after such a gloom, but he chokes up (and his black soul) and dies and dies). It was very subtly and at the same time brightly showed who was a true evil there, and not just the rough power of nature and the metaphorical revenge of the Eskimos to the damned white man. The final scene of the series, however, is an order of magnitude sad. Although we were eliminated from a lecture on the topic of Inuite myths and a strange marriage to Lady Silent, but the burning of the ship was also removed, and as a result, the series ends on a Crose sitting over an ice hole in the middle of glaciers, and a music plays completely inappropriate to the background. Needless to say, such a scene of the feeling of catharsis does not cause absolutely.

I will add to the appendage, which in both cases greatly depressed, which was surviving Crozier. From a feature, a poorly physically developed, more elderly than the majority of the crew, who suffers from alcoholism is stronger than everyone at all-he never gets very tired, does not grasp scurvy when she is already sick of all exception, nothing bad happens to him at all. This is explained exactly by the fact that he, you see, the main character. And okay, Krosier would be such a hero, for whom you are worse, but no, for the same Fitzjims, Goodsir and Blacki you worry much more, so it would be better to survive one of them, or nobody at all, and so ..

Nevertheless, although the final left behind a nasty aftertaste, from 90% that the novel, that the series, I remained under great impression. This is indisputably one of the most worked out, large-scale and unusual survivalhouses that I have ever seen. And I saw them, believe me, a lot.



发表回复

您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注